Throughout your discussion, give your analysis (opinion) about what they say.Your purpose is to analyze each author’s main points of disagreement and to probethe ideas, beliefs, values, and concerns that underlie their disagreement. WHY dothey disagree? What leads to this disagreement?
Then you will present the opposing position and discuss what those 2 scholars say. In thispart of the discussion, you will demonstrate an awareness of how these 2 sources differ from thefirst 2 sources. You will also analyze what they say and then give your opinion about theirpositions
New Sources-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/…
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/…
First  2 SOURCES 
Kiss, Jamie. “Gun violence and mental illness.” The Lancet Psychiatry 1.5 2014: 335–336. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(14)70382-7/fulltext
Lu, Yu, and Jeff R. Temple. “Dangerous weapons or dangerous people? The temporal associations between gun violence and mental health.” Preventive Medicine 121 2019: 1–12. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091743519300143
Decide which position to begin with. Describe it in detail and define that position• Introduce the first author and the article/book/source they wrote and tell the reader what that author’sargument is (be objective, summarize accurately, use at least 1 quote). Summariesof source positions should be precise (8-12 sentences each)• Comment on what that author says–give your analysis, i.e., your opinion,about their ideas–throughout the summary. Every time you summarize an ideafrom your source, you must then comment on it. (page 177)Begin 2nd position discussion:• NEXT–introduce the OPPOSING side. What is this position? Describe it indetail and define that position and state clearly HOW it is opposed to the First position your first author’s hold.• Introduce the Second author and the article/book/source they wrote (use theproper introduction sentence) and tell the reader what that author’sargument is (be objective, summarize accurately, use at least 1 quote)• Comment on what that author says–give your analysis, i.e., your opinion, abouttheir ideas–throughout the summary. Every time you summarize one of theirpoints, you comment on it—and you Compare/Contrast that idea with the firstscholar. You “participate in the debate” between these 2 peopleConclusion:• Finally, analyze WHY these scholars differ. What is the common ground they allagree on, and then sum up the parts that they disagree on? Analyze what is within each position that you think is VALID, and then what you think is wrong with that position. Next, give a couple lead-in sentences that move towards YOUR thesis, which should be the last sentence of this part