Conduct a search for information on one of the following aversive procedures: guided (forced) compliance, attention extinction, and escape extinction. Cite the source and describe the treatment.
Discuss 3–4 pro statements that might be given to support the use of the treatment. Also, discuss 3–4 con statements that might be given to oppose the treatment.
Evaluate your findings. Discuss at least four relevant BACB ethics codes.

Britt_aba_procedures.docx

2
Controversial Treatment
(You may state which treatment as your heading, i.e., Escape Extinction)
In this section, you will begin by fully describing one of the provided evidence-based controversial procedures using information from at least one reputable source. Describe what it might look like to implement the controversial treatment.
Pros to Controversial Treatment
In this section, you will discuss ( in your own words) three pros regarding the evidence-based controversial treatment, provide significant context around these statements, and cite information from a reputable source. Direct quotes should not be utilized, as you can convey your understanding in your own words.
Cons to Controversial Treatment
In this section, you will discuss ( in your own words) three cons regarding the evidence-based controversial treatment, provide significant context around these statements, and cite information from a reputable source. Direct quotes should not be utilized, as you can convey your understanding in your own words.
Evaluation of Ethics
In this section, you will evaluate the evidence-based controversial procedure using at least four of the BACB ethics codes, and justifies one’s own opinion on the topic. You may provide the specific code numbers and titles of the codes you discuss. You will not copy/paste the code description. Discuss the relevance of the code to the topic in your own words. Cite and reference the BACB Ethics Codes for Behavior Analysts. Also, justify your own opinion on the topic.

Conclusion

References