Learning Theories Comparison
This is a two-part assignment. Please read the instructions in the What You Need to Know section prior to completing the worksheet.
 
1. First complete the theory comparison in the chart below in Part 1.
 
2. Once you complete the theory comparison, reflect on your performance on the rubric’s scoring criteria for the assignment to complete the self-evaluation in Part 2.
 
Part 1: Learning Theories Comparison
1) Name of Theory
 
2) Summary
 
3) Strengths
 
4) Limitations
 
5) Examples of the theory in action
 
6) Personal thoughts about the theory (can include how you would integrate it with other theories)
 
Ranked 1st
 
Ranked 2nd
 
Ranked 3rd
 
Ranked 4th
 
Ranked 5th
 
References
 
Part 2: Self-Evaluation
Conduct a self-evaluation using the eight established scoring criteria and identifying the proficiency level for each criterion. The distinguished levels of the criteria are listed in the chart.
 
Identify the level of your performance as either:
 
· Nonperformance.
 
· Basic.
 
· Proficient.
 
· Distinguished.
 
Provide a description of your reason for each score that you gave yourself. In this description, you can use first person since you are reflecting on your own performance.
 
Criterion
 
Note: The distinguished levels of the criteria are listed in this chart.
 
Level (choose one for each criterion below):
 
· Nonperformance.
 
· Basic.
 
· Proficient.
 
· Distinguished.
 
Description of why you gave yourself each score:
 
Summarizes five learning theories with clarity and depth of detail.
 
Explains the strengths of five learning theories with clarity and detail that is supported by a professional source.
 
Explains the limitations of five learning theories with clarity and detail that is supported by a professional source.
 
Applies five learning theories to multiple professional and personal examples.
 
Explains personal thoughts about multiple learning theories with clarity and depth of detail.
 
Assesses personal performance on assignment tasks, including the proficiency for each criterion and an explanation of the scores with a clear reflection on performance.
 
Presents a focused purpose through strong organizational skills. Presents evidence through strong paraphrasing or summarizing and appropriate tone and sentence structure.
 
Applies APA style, including in-text citations and full references for sources with few errors.