Please  find an article or news story about some whistle-blowing situation.  Please do not use high-profile cases like Snowden or Manning. If you can  find the same story described by different sources all the better. Do  not use some personal experience unless it was discussed in credible new  sources. I need to be able to verify the account. 
Then,  using the attached worksheet, discuss the case. Specifically, after  telling me about the case in a concise paragraph, you will identify all  of the key stakeholders and how you feel they were impacted. For  example, if someone released company records and emails to blow the  whistle, discuss whose emails and how the information led to actions  against them. If no one was negatively impacted, then why use it for  this case study? 
Discuss  the final outcome (see directions), and most importantly, use your  moral compass to describe or explain why you feel someone’s actions were  morally wrong. DO NOT attempt to work out what any of the actors  involved were thinking or what motivation they may or may not have had.  What matters is ONLY your beliefs about whether the actions were morally  right or wrong. Use named moral theories to support your position.  Again, if there was no wrongdoing, why was some whistle blown? 
Finally,  imagine you are in a leadership position. What could you reasonably do  to keep the situation from happening again and prevent someone from  feeling a need to blow the whistle? Depending on the situation, you may  feel the real wrongdoer is the whistleblower. If so, then describe why  what the company/government did or is doing is justified, again using  your moral theories.

CaseStudyAnalysisWorksheet9.2024.docx

Use the following format to write a paper to discuss your case study. Each section should be at least one fully developed paragraph.
Name:
Case Study Title: Include a full APA or MLA citation in your reference section with URL link.
1. Briefly what happened? Summarize the case.

2. Key Stakeholders and how they were impacted: Discuss at least 4 major stakeholders (not stockholders, though the stockholders may be stakeholders). For each stakeholder, briefly explain the relationship with the company, organization, or person – why they are stakeholders and how were they impacted? You may use bullet points to summarize each stakeholder.

3. What was the final outcome? Include specific details such as prison, fines, termination, and for how many individuals. Make sure to cite your facts.

4. Describe why you feel someone’s actions were morally wrong? Using names moral theories discuss why you believe these behaviors were morally right or wrong. Be sure to use keywords describing your moral base (consequentialist, care, duty, act utilitarian, prima facie duties, etc.) and why your compass would justify classifying the action as morally right or wrong. Be sure to document the resource(s) you use for the definition of the moral theory or theories.

5. Put yourself in a position of leadership: Describe what you would put in place that would have prevented this in the first place or keep it from happening again. Or, alternatively what rules would you would implement to justify the action. Discuss rules in the context of your leadership philosophy or ethical standard.

References: At least one reference is required in APA/MLA format. Intext citations should be used to show where you used your research . Note that if your major requires a different style (Chicago, Turabian, etc.), use it. Just be consistent.